中医辨证思维的认知神经机制研究思路

黄慧雯; 贾春华; 曹灵勇

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.12.004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

中医辨证思维的认知神经机制研究思路

理论研究 | 更新时间：2024-01-03

- 中医辨证思维的认知神经机制研究思路
- Research thought on the cognitive neural mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation thinking
- 北京中医药大学学报 2023年46卷第12期页码：1648-1652
- 作者机构：
  
  1.浙江中医药大学基础医学院　杭州　310053
  2.北京中医药大学中医学院
- 作者简介：
  
  黄慧雯，女，博士，助理研究员
  #曹灵勇，男，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向：仲景经方辨治理论与临床研究，E-mail：caolingyong@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(82305434;82074582);浙江中医药大学自主课题（人才专项）(2022RCZXZK14)
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.12.004
  中图分类号：
扫描看全文
黄慧雯, 贾春华, 曹灵勇. 中医辨证思维的认知神经机制研究思路[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2023,46(12):1648-1652.

HUANG Huiwen, JIA Chunhua, CAO Lingyong. Research thought on the cognitive neural mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation thinking[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023,46(12):1648-1652.
黄慧雯, 贾春华, 曹灵勇. 中医辨证思维的认知神经机制研究思路[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2023,46(12):1648-1652. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.12.004.

HUANG Huiwen, JIA Chunhua, CAO Lingyong. Research thought on the cognitive neural mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation thinking[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023,46(12):1648-1652. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.12.004.

摘要

揭示中医辨证思维规律是中医药原创性思维研究的重要内容，涉及大脑认知神经活动原理。然而，传统的辨证研究缺乏对医者辨证认知机制的探讨。本文在认知科学的背景下，提出中医辨证思维认知神经机制研究的新范式。本文首先讨论了辨证思维研究的认知转向，继而指明大脑工作记忆可能是反映中医辨证思维的重要窗口。在此基础上，提出中医阴阳辨证认知神经机制工作假说，并设计相关认知神经科学实验方案，以事件相关电位和功能性磁共振成像等技术探索大脑如何进行阴阳辨证思维。此研究路径的实施将阐明辨证思维的内在认知神经机制，为中医辨证思维提供来自认知神经科学的评价指标，为中医人才辨证能力培养提供认知原理支撑。

Abstract

Revealing the rules of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome differentiation thinking is an important part of researching the original thinking in TCM, which involves brain cognition and neural activity principles. However, traditional research on syndrome differentiation lacks exploration of the cognitive mechanisms of TCM practitioners during syndrome differentiation. In this context of cognitive science, this paper proposes a new paradigm for studying the cognitive neural mechanisms of TCM syndrome differentiation thinking. Firstly, the paper discusses the cognitive shift in syndrome differentiation research and then points out that working memory may be an important window reflecting TCM syndrome differentiation thinking. Based on this, we propose a working hypothesis for the cognitive neural mechanisms of TCM's yin-yang syndrome differentiation and design relevant cognitive neuroscience experimental protocols to explore how the brain engages in yin-yang syndrome differentiation thinking using techniques such as event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging. The implementation of this research pathway can clarify the intrinsic cognitive neural mechanisms of syndrome differentiation thinking, provide evaluation indicators for TCM syndrome differentiation thinking from cognitive neuroscience, and provide cognitive principles to support the cultivation of syndrome differentiation ability of TCM talents.

关键词

辨证神经机制专家事件相关电位功能性磁共振成像中医思维

Keywords

syndrome differentiationneural mechanismexpertevent-related potentialfunctional magnetic resonance imagingtraditional Chinese medicine thinking

references

陶嘉磊，袁斌，汪受传. 中医证候学研究的技术方法及其运用现状[J]. 中华中医药杂志，2018, 33(7): 2982－2985.

王永炎. 完善中医辨证方法体系的建议[J]. 中医杂志，2004, 45(10): 729－731.

朱文锋. 创立以证素为核心的辨证新体系[J]. 湖南中医学院学报，2004, 24(6): 38－39.

张宇鹏. 中医辨证思维框架探析[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志，2021, 27(1): 4－9.

王子涛，李倩，苏涛，等. 中医辨证思维与证候标准的多样性探讨[J]. 实用医学杂志，2015, 31(21): 3469－3472.

徐云浩，王洋，陶文娟，等. 中医辨证的象思维属性及对微观辨证的指导价值[J]. 中医杂志，2022, 63(10): 901－904.

朱丽颖，贾春华. 基于认知心理学的中医辨证研究[J]. 世界中医药，2014, 9(11): 1463－1470.

谢菁，王鼎，彭进，等. 从认知角度初探中医辨证论治概念隐喻的特征[J]. 亚太传统医药，2018, 14(11): 71－72.

贾春华. 中医病因病机理论的追问：以《伤寒论》太阳中风证及桂枝汤为案例[J]. 北京中医药大学学报，2020, 43(7): 553－556.

王凯旋. 中医临床诊疗经验智力结构及其认知、神经特征[D]. 福州：福建师范大学，2021.

李本岳，李伟荣，潘华峰，等. 人工智能对中医诊断的影响[J]. 世界科学技术—中医药现代化，2020, 22(5): 1624－1628.

常文婧，刘建平，陈薇. 名老中医专家意见在中医药临床实践指南制订中的应用[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志，2022, 42(9): 1118－1123.

HANNAH TC, TURNER D, KELLNER R, et al. Neuromonitoring Correlates of Expertise Level in Surgical Performers: A Systematic Review[J/OL]. Front Hum Neurosci，2022，16：705238 [2023－04－05]. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.705238/fullhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2022.705238/full.

马淬兰，贾春华. 中医临床思维研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志，2022, 37(1): 87－90.

魏景汉，罗跃嘉. 事件相关电位原理与技术[M]. 北京：科学出版社，2010: 29－30.

陈宜张. 脑研究的前沿与展望[M]. 上海：上海科学技术出版社，2018: 264－269.

PEÑALVER JMG, LÓPEZ-GARCÍA D, GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA C, et al. Top-down specific preparatory activations for selective attention and perceptual expectations[J/OL]. Neuroimage, 2023, 271: 119960 [2023－04－05]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811923001064?via%3Dihubhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811923001064?via%3Dihub.

MARES I, EWING L, PAPASAVVA M, et al. Face recognition ability is manifest in early dynamic decoding of face-orientation selectivity: Evidence from multi-variate pattern analysis of the neural response[J].Cortex, 2023, 159: 299－312.

吴彤，黄慧雯，窦嘉乐，等. 五行生克关系判断的事件相关电位和功能性磁共振成像研究[J]. 世界中医药，2022, 17(23): 3296－3302.

黄慧雯，吴彤，窦嘉乐，等. 中医阴阳类比映射的具体和抽象认知趋同现象[J]. 世界中医药，2022, 17(23): 3325－3330.

黄慧雯，吴彤，窦嘉乐，等. 中医阴阳转化思维不对称性的认知神经加工机制[J]. 世界中医药，2022, 17(23): 3318－3324.

HUANG HW, HAN BX, JIA CH, et al. How do medical students understand disease behaviors? Evidence from event-related potentials[J]. J Tradit Chin Med Sci, 2022, 9(2): 135－142.

刘宁. 围棋专家的认知优势表现及其脑基础[D]. 上海：华东师范大学，2019.

HRUSKA P, KRIGOLSON O, CODERRE S, et al. Working memory, reasoning, and expertise in medicine: insights into their relationship using functional neuroima-ging[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2016, 21(5): 935－952.

陈玉田，陈睿，李鹏. 工作记忆中“组块”概念的演化及理论模型[J]. 心理科学进展，2022, 30(12): 2708－2717.

GUIDA A, GOBET F, TARDIEU H, et al. How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: a two-stage framework[J]. Brain Cogn, 2012, 79(3): 221－244.

D’ESPOSITO M, POSTLE BR. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2015, 66：115－142.

MILLER EK, LUNDQVIST M, BASTOS AM. Working Memory 2.0[J]. Neuron, 2018, 100(2)：463－475.

LI TH, GAO YF, WU Y. The influences of working memory updating on word association effects and thematic role assignment during sentence processing[J/OL]. Neuropsychologia, 2023, 184: 108547 [2023－09－24]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223000817?via%3Dihubhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393223000817?via%3Dihub.

YANG XH, ZHANG XP, ZHANG Y, et al. How working memory capacity modulates the time course of semantic integration at sentence and discourse level[J/OL]. Neuropsychologia, 2020, 140: 107383 [2023－09－24]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393220300555?via%3Dihubhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393220300555?via%3Dihub.

LONG NM, KUHL BA. Decoding the tradeoff between encoding and retrieval to predict memory for overlapping events[J/OL]. Neuroimage, 2019, 201: 116001 [2023－04－05]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919305828?via%3Dihubhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811919305828?via%3Dihub.

STEINHAUER K, ROYLE P, DRURY JE, et al. The priming of priming: Evidence that the N400 reflects context-dependent post-retrieval word integration in working memory[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2017, 651: 192－197.

SALA G, GOBET F. Experts’ memory superiority for domain-specific random material generalizes across fields of expertise: A meta-analysis[J]. Mem Cognit, 2017, 45(2): 183－193.

ANNIS J, PALMERI TJ. Modeling memory dynamics in visual expertise[J]. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2019, 45(9): 1599－1618.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于中医语言的中医思维研究——来自认知神经科学的新方法

探讨从肺论治原发免疫性血小板减少症

论经筋理论的整体观

妊娠期糖尿病的证素辨证初探

基于复杂网络技术的冠心病患者四诊信息分布模式的研究