1.北京中医药大学中药学院 北京 102488
2.山西省安泽县林业局
3.北京宇辰致业科技有限公司
潘秀珍,女,在读硕士生
# 李卫东,男,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要研究方向:中药资源评价与利用,E-mail:liweidong2005@126.com
纸质出版日期:2023-09-30,
网络出版日期:2023-07-03,
收稿日期:2023-03-24,
移动端阅览
潘秀珍, 刘路路, 任晓红, 等. 基于近红外光谱技术建立连翘叶中5种活性成分动态定量模型[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2023,46(9):1280-1290.
PAN Xiuzhen, LIU Lulu, REN Xiaohong, et al. Establishing dynamic quantitative models of five active ingredients in
潘秀珍, 刘路路, 任晓红, 等. 基于近红外光谱技术建立连翘叶中5种活性成分动态定量模型[J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2023,46(9):1280-1290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2023.09.013.
PAN Xiuzhen, LIU Lulu, REN Xiaohong, et al. Establishing dynamic quantitative models of five active ingredients in
目的
2
基于近红外(NIR)光谱技术,通过建立连翘叶中5种活性成分(总黄酮、总酚、连翘酯苷A、连翘苷和芦丁)的动态定量模型,快速检测其含量并追踪年动态变化规律。
方法
2
2021年5—11月,采收连翘叶共72批次。采用NIR光谱技术结合偏最小二乘法,建立连翘叶中总黄酮、总酚、连翘酯苷A、连翘苷和芦丁含量的NIR快速检测动态定量模型。
结果
2
连翘叶中总黄酮、总酚、连翘酯苷A、连翘苷和芦丁动态定量模型的相关系数分别为0.950 1、0.931 1、0.957 3、0.942 9和0.977 3;校正集预测标准偏差分别为1.39、0.68、0.48、0.10和0.07;验证集中预测值与实测值的平均相对误差分别为9.39%、10.27%、16.40%、5.58%和7.96%。5种活性成分的验证集样本的参考值与NIR光谱预测值的配对
t
检验值分别为1.137、0.127、0.785、1.491和0.150;
P
值分别为0.269、0.900、0.441、0.149和0.882。5种活性成分含量均在5—6月较高,7月大幅度降低,8月有所回升,9—10月开始降低。初霜后活性成分含量较霜前明显升高,达全年最高,为连翘叶的最佳采收期。
结论
2
建立的NIR光谱动态定量模型稳定性和准确性较好,且预测准确度良好。此模型可快速预测不同采收期连翘叶中5种活性成分含量及其动态变化规律。
Objective
2
In order to rapidly detect the contents of the five active compounds (total flavonoids
total polyphenols
forsythiaside A
forsythin and rutin) in
Forsythia suspensa
leaves and explore the nature of their annual dynamic changes
we established dynamic quantitative models based on near-infrared(NIR) spectroscopy.
Methods
2
This study used
F
.
suspensa
leaves
which had been collected from May to November 2021(72 batches altogether)
as samples. NIR spectroscopy combined with partial least-squares analysis was used to establish NIR rapid-detection models for the contents of the five active compounds
including total flavonoids
total polyphenols
forsythiaside A
forsythin
and rutin.
Results
2
The correlation coefficients in the quantitative models of total flavonoids
total polyphenols
forsythiaside A
forsythin
and rutin in
F
.
suspensa
leaves were 0.950 1
0.931 1
0.957 3
0.942 9
and 0.977 3
respectively. The standard errors of the validation set were 1.39
0.68
0.48
0.10
and 0.07
while the average relative errors between the predicted values and the measured values of the validation set were 9.39%
10.27%
16.40%
5.58%
and 7.96%. Paired
t
test values of the reference values of total flavonoids
total polyphenols
forsythiaside A
forsythin
and rutin to their corresponding predicted values of NIR spectroscopy were 1.137
0.127
0.785
1.491
and 0.150
while the
P
values were 0.269
0.900
0.441
0.149
and 0.882. The content of the five active compounds were higher from May to June
decreased quickly in July
recovered in August
and decreased from September to October. The content of active ingredients increased significantly after the first frost compared to before the frost
reaching the highest during the whole year
suggesting the best period for harvesting
F
.
suspensa
leaves.
Conclusion
2
The NIR quantitative models established in this study were stable
showed efficacy
and displayed great prediction accuracy. This model can quickly predict the content of five active compounds and their dynamic changes in
F
.
suspensa
leaves across different harvesting periods.
连翘叶活性成分近红外光谱技术动态定量模型
Forsythia suspensa leavesactive compoundsnear-infrared spectroscopydynamic quantitative model
张晨曦, 刘素香, 赵艳敏, 等. 基于液质联用技术的连翘化学成分分析[J]. 中草药, 2016, 47(12): 2053-2060.
张旭, 邵思远, 冯子明, 等. 连翘化学成分研究[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(9): 2095-2099.
马丽莎, 贾金萍, 张元波, 等. 连翘不同部位生物活性比较研究[J]. 化学研究与应用, 2018, 30(2): 177-182.
王学方, 陈玲,宁二娟, 等. 连翘叶中7种成分的抗氧化活性研究[J]. 饲料研究, 2023, 46(2): 94-99.
梅雪, 周安琴, 李静, 等. 连翘叶的化学成分、药理学与毒理学研究概况[J]. 中国药房, 2015, 26(22): 3143-3146.
范圣此, 张立伟. 连翘产业现状的分析及其相关问题的对策研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2018, 20(4): 371-376.
原江锋, 赵君峰, 孙军杰, 等. 河南、山西连翘叶黄酮类和三萜酸类化合物含量比较[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(10): 164-167.
刘路路, 李可, 韦智江, 等. 基于响应面法和熵权法优化连翘叶中连翘酯苷A、连翘苷和芦丁提取工艺[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(2): 166-173.
NICOLA C, MARTIN B, IAN D. Near-Infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging for non-destructive quality assessment of cereal grains [J]. Applied Spectroscopy Rev, 2018, 53(8): 667-687.
WANG F, JIA B, DAI J, et al. Qualitative classification of Dendrobium huoshanense(Feng dou) using fast non-destructive hand-held near infrared spectroscopy [J]. J Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2022, 30(3): 147-153.
MA H, XIAO LL, XU DC, et al. Non-invasive detection of anti-inflammatory bioactivity and key chemical indicators of the commercial lanqin oral solution by near infrared spectroscopy [J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(9): 2955.
SHI XY, GAN XQ, WANG XB, et al. Rapid detection of Ganoderma lucidum spore powder adulterated with dyed starch by NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics [J/OL]. LWT, 2022, 167(8): 113829[2022-12-08]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643822007642https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643822007642.
DONG YQ, SHAN Y, LI P, et al. Nondestructive characterization of citrus fruit by near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy(NIRDRS) with principal component analysis(PCA) and fisher linear discriminant analysis(FLDA) [J]. Analytical Letters, 2022, 55(16): 2554-2563.
李明, 韩东海, 鲁丁强, 等. 近红外光谱通用模型在农产品及食品检测中的研究进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(11): 3355-3360.
HUANG TC, CAI GM, LIU HB, et al. Selecting near-infrared reflection spectroscopy pretreatment methods by chemical components valid and invalid absorption wavebands [J]. Spectroscopy Letters, 2022, 55(9): 607-617.
左旭丽, 潘秀珍, 耿泽宇, 等. 经19种光谱预处理筛选建立3种连翘叶茶近红外定性定量模型[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(19): 6431-6440.
WANG YG, GAO Y, YU XZ, et al. Rapid determination of Lycium Barbarum polysaccharide with effective wavelength selection using near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy [J]. Food Analytical Methods, 2016, 9(1): 131-138.
班超, 秦亚东, 李林华. 安徽结香花蕾中总黄酮的含量测定[J]. 中国林副特产, 2020, 169(6): 1-3.
中国国家标准化管理委员会. 茶叶中茶多酚和儿茶素类含量的检测方法:GB/T 8313—2018[S].北京: 中国标准出版社,2018:2-5.
崔蕴涵, 许金钗, 方智毅, 等. 莲子含水率近红外光谱检测模型构建[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(18): 130-135.
WANG JH, WANG J, CHEN Z, et al. Development of multi-cultivar models for predicting the soluble solid content and firmness of European pear(Pyrus communis L.) using portable vis-NIR spectroscopy [J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2017, 129:143-151.
GAO F, ZHANG YJ, LIU X. A study of the reliability and accuracy of the real-time detection of Forage Maize quality using a home-built near-infrared spectrometer [J/OL]. Foods, 2022, 11(21): 3490[2022-10-07].https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/21/3490https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/21/3490.
李俊杰, 张绩, 汪小伟, 等. 近红外光谱大数据分析塔罗科血橙内在品质的研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(20): 193-197.
卢莉, 程曦, 刘金仙, 等. 小种红茶水浸出物近红外定量分析模型的建立[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(5): 189-193.
WANG D, WANG M, SHEN W, et al. Analysis of chemical compounds and toxicological evaluation of Forsythia suspensa leaves tea [J]. Food Sci Biotechnol, 2021, 30(2): 305-314.
雷瑞祥, 杨冰月, 高静, 等. 干旱胁迫对远志愈伤组织次生代谢产物含量及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(22): 109-116.
李倩, 李晓, 陈玲, 等. 连翘叶研究进展[J]. 饲料研究, 2013,36(6): 21-23.
周琨, 张彩霞, 王伟艳, 等. 连翘叶微生态制剂对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化能力、免疫功能及肠道微生物的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19): 47-52.
安志霞, 潘阳阳, 范碧玥, 等. 基于网络药理学研究连翘叶提取物通过AMPK抗恩诺沙星诱导肝损伤的作用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2022, 49(6): 2347-2361.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构